|
|
|
|
|
|
HomeApparelBack Seam Sheer Pantyhose |
|
|  | | | Customer Reviews: | | | Average Customer Review:
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Great Price Mediocre Quality Apr 13, 2009
After searching for backseam pantyhose without contrast (beige on beige) for months, when I saw these offered on Amazon, I jumped and bought five pair. The price was right and buy ordering a large quantity I qualified for free shipping. It was a great deal...if you don't count the quality of the hose. They look all right but the yarn is a bit fuzzy and they tend to cling to any non-slippery fabric. For example, if I wear them under a cotton dress, the hem of the dress will climb my legs as I walk. This can be mitigated a bit by wearing a longer slip, but it doesn't completely prevent the skirt from sticking to the hose and climbing up. I don't regret buying them because I think they will be great for occasional wear and costuming, but I would not buy them again. Instead, I'll keep looking for non-contrast backseam hose that are better quality (a bit more silky) so that I can wear them everyday.
 Seamed Pantyhose Sexy But Cheap Jan 17, 2009
Cheap cheap cheap, @ 2$ you get what you get. I loved them but they are not very good quailty at all. I wore them once and they had tears all over, and believe me I wasn't doing anything a normal day in pantyhose wouldn't except.
disappointed Jan 06, 2009
Hosiery were a "matte" weave. Therefore, there were not appropriate for dress occasions which was my reason for ordering.
5 of 5 found the following review helpful:
Laughable... Dec 13, 2008
I bought these to wear with a favorite pencil skirt for a fun retro look. They came out of the packaging with snags! Not to mention the "seam" was just a zig-zag stich up the back of the crappiest pair of pantyhose I've ever seen. The "nylon" wasn't even a consistent weave -- when I put them on, my husband and I broke out in laughter because it looked like I had mottled legs... at least they were good for a laugh.
I didn't expect much for the price, but at any price these are a waste of money as they are completely unwearable and now line the bottom of my trash can.
1 of 1 found the following review helpful:
get what you pay for Dec 07, 2008
I got these to have some backseamed stockings for my vintage outfits without having to shell out for a garter belt, and for three dollars they're fine. I wouldn't recommend them though. They look nice when you put them on, but the one size fits all means that if you're on the middle or lower end of the size range, the tights slowly sink as you walk until the crotch is nearly at the knee. Not very elastic.
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
